When one puts
up an application to an officer, the concerned person replies back to the
applicant. But in the court matters the case is different. When a petition is
submitted in the court, the judgment is announced. The judgment is not sent to
the petitioner directly.
First of all,
after the hearing is over, the clerk is to be kept in good humor to know
whether the judgment has been announced. The clerk does not give a copy of the
judgment directly to the petitioner. As per the present practice the petitioner
has to apply for a certified copy of the judgment.
It is a well
known fact that the practice which is being followed in our law courts, are the
practice which was being followed during the British era. During this time
though a huge volume of water has flown through the rivers, we still follow the
same old practice. Which practice is followed in Britain is not our concern.
The fact that matters is the practice we are supposed to follow and what is
being followed.
The British were
the rulers. They were ruling over us. They maintained a distance because we
were looked down in their eyes. Unfortunately enough, the Indian Judges also act like that
of the judges of the British period, even though they are Indian citizens and
deciding the cases of the Indian Citizens.
I do not find
any harm if the judgment is given directly to the petitioner. There is
absolutely no need of a via media like certified copy. Some people
argue that there may be manipulation in the judgment. This apprehension was
there in the days when Photo Copy machines were not invented. During those
days copyists were employed to write the judgment by hand and there was every
possibility for a mistake, addition or omission of a word or a sentence by
mistake or by chance or with a malaise intention. Strangely enough, people
those who matter suspect the performance of a lifeless machine for which all
are alike and it does not have a near and dear to support or to oppose. Sadly
enough, Indian Judiciary has reserved its place in Guinness Book of World
Records for taking century long time to decide a
case. Certified Copy of a judgment has a role to play for the delay.
We observe that
when a case is filed a court fee or stamp duty is paid. This means that the
petitioner has paid money for decision over an issue or a dispute and conveying
him the judgment. It is sheer injustice to take money for a purpose and
betraying the petitioner. There is absolutely no room for a certified copy.
To sum up, I am
of the opinion that the copy of the judgment may be given to the parties on the
date of pronouncement of the judgment.
I hope the
matter will draw due attention.
No comments:
Post a Comment